Horizontal rigid track fall protection systems will always be superior to rigid I-Beam systems due to their inherent design differences. But by far, the differences in their performance in cold weather climates and dirty applications are the most telling. I-Beam systems utilize an old fashioned I-Beam with an exposed rolling trolley that moves on the beam’s exposed lower flange. In climates that see snow and ice, I-Beam systems are rendered useless due to accumulation of snow and ice on the exposed lower flange. The trolley cannot move well through the ice and snow. Even in warm weather climates, or indoor applications, I-Beam system performance can be poor due to dirt, dust, and animal droppings. Grain applications can be especially problematic due to deposits from flocks of birds building up on the beam flange. Manufacturers of these systems may argue that a scraper can be applied to the trolley to remove flange obstacles. If a worker is removing flange obstacles, not only is he being placed into a fall hazard, but he is also wasting valuable work time.
Rigid Lifelines enclosed track design eliminates the potential hazards of ice, snow, and dirt buildup.
Other deficiencies in I-Beam systems include:
Rigid Lifelines enclosed track design is superior to I-Beam systems because:
Thank you for reading this entry!
Remember, Rigid Lifelines is the Future of Fall Protection™…..
Michael Evanko
Your comment has been successfully submitted! and will appear shortly pending approval.
© SPANCO®, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy|Terms of Use|Contact Us|Site Map|
08:23 AM
No Comments Yet.